There used to be time when all an Eco tyre needed to do was simply reduce a car’s fuel consumption. While this is still a priority in this category, eco tyres now need to have a wider variety of talents in order to be the natural choice for the burgeoning Electric Vehicle (EV) market.

This represents new challenges for this category. Firstly, EVs tend to be heavier than Internal Combustion Engine (ICE) cars. As a result, these tyres now have more loads to handle, so tyre manufacturers can no longer get away with skimping on the tyre’s construction to lighten the unsprung mass.

Next, EVs also are known for their phenomenal acceleration. There are countless examples of Teslas out-dragging supercars on YouTube ad nauseam. This places a premium on grip, which somewhat works against lowering rolling resistance which is the biggest contribution a tyre can make towards lowering energy consumption.

With these seemingly opposing demands, the latest Eco tyres have a big challenge ahead of them.

This year, the tyres that are up to the challenge of being the ultimate Eco tyre are:

• Hankook Ventus Prime 3
• Nexen NBlue HD
• Pirelli Cinturato P7
• Yokohama BluEarth-GT AE51

These tyres were tested in 215/55 R17 size and fitted to a Kia Niro EV. With strong interest in Electric Vehicles (EVs), it made sense to use one of the most accessible models in the segment that comfortably strikes a balance between value and capability.

As efficiency is still paramount in an Eco tyre, we placed the highest emphasis or percentage weightage on Rolling Resistance. Additionally, as we envision that more Eco tyres will be fitted on whisper-quiet EVs, the last thing an EV driver would want is for the smooth and silent drive to be ruined by tyre noise intruding into the cabin. Hence why the results of the Noise Test also accounts for a large part of the final score.

With the considerable weight of EVs, braking performance would also be a concern as well. Lastly, we factored Dry Grip into our final score because that translates to the tyre’s ability to handle the instantaneous torque that so many EV drivers love as it allows them to show off how fast their cars can go in a straight line…

For the Eco category, our weightages were:

• Rolling resistance – 35%
• Noise – 15%
• Dry Braking – 15%
• Wet Braking – 15%
• Dry Grip – 10%

---

The Raw Data

---

The Results

4th: Yokohama BluEarth-GT AE51 (83.23%)

Test Station	Weightage	Position	Raw Score	Diff. to Leader	Diff. to Leader (%)
Dry Handling (Circuit)	0	2nd	72.74 s	+0.34 s	-0.47%
Dry Grip (Skidpan)	10%	4th	0.712 g	-0.047 g	-6.18%
Wet Grip (Skidpan)	15%	3rd	0.695 g	-0.018 g	-2.53%
Dry Braking	10%	4th	26.20 m	+6.07 m	-30.13%
Wet Braking	15%	3rd	26.30 m	+1.87 m	-7.64%
Noise	15%	3rd	87dB	+7 dB	-8.75%
Rolling Resistance	35%	4th	70.70 m	-29.50 m	-29.44%

As with some other categories. The competition was also tight in the Eco category. Which means that all the tyres here are already very capable. In this case, just 10% separates the Yokohama BluEarth-GT AE51 from the winner of this category.

Unfortunately, the Yokohama did well in almost all stations but fell behind where it counted most, the Rolling Resistance test, where it trailed the leader by a whopping 30%.

RRP: S$180

3rd: Nexen N’Blue HD (91.58%)

Test Station	Weightage	Position	Raw Score	Diff. to Leader	Diff. to Leader (%)
Dry Handling (Circuit)	0	4th	74.65 s	+2.25 s	-3.12%
Dry Grip (Skidpan)	10%	2nd	0.729 g	-0.030 g	-3.85%
Wet Grip (Skidpan)	15%	4th	0.651 g	-0.062 g	-8.80%
Dry Braking	10%	3rd	25.20 m	+5.07 m	-25.17%
Wet Braking	15%	4th	27.27 m	+2.84 m	-11.60%
Noise	15%	2nd	85 dB	+5 dB	-6.25%
Rolling Resistance	35%	2nd	95.83 m	-4.37 m	-4.36%

The fight between the Korean tyres for second and third placings turned out to be as intense as the final round of Squid Game. Eventually, the Nexen couldn’t brake or grip as well as its Gganbu, in the wet or dry. Instead, this is a tyre that favors efficiency over performance so it did reasonably well in the Rolling Resistance and Noise tests. Too bad though, that the Nexen had to be eliminated. 

RRP: S$122

2nd: Hankook Ventus Prime 3 (95.77%)

Test Station	Weightage	Position	Raw Score	Diff. to Leader	Diff. to Leader (%)
Dry Handling (Circuit)	0	1st	72.40 s	–	–
Dry Grip (Skidpan)	10%	1st	0.759 g	–	–
Wet Grip (Skidpan)	15%	1st	0.713 g	–	–
Dry Braking	10%	2nd	22.78 m	-2.65 m	-13.16%
Wet Braking	15%	1st	24.43 m	–	–
Noise	15%	1st	80 dB	–	–
Rolling Resistance	35%	3rd	91.87 m	-8.33 m	-8.32%

Here is what happens when a performance tyre tries to sneak into the Eco category. The Hankook was actually the grippiest in the dry, had the shortest braking distance in the wet and was also the quietest in the group. Ultimately however, the Rolling Resistance Test once again claimed another victim and this time, it cost this Korean tyre the Eco title.

RRP: S$142

1st: Pirelli Cinturato P7 (96.47%)

Test Station	Weightage	Position	Raw Score	Diff. to Leader	Diff. to Leader (%)
Dry Handling (Circuit)	0	3rd	73.87 s	+1.47 s	-2.03%
Dry Grip (Skidpan)	10%	3rd	0.719 g	-0.040 g	-5.15%
Wet Grip (Skidpan)	15%	2nd	0.711 g	-0.002 g	-0.36%
Dry Braking	10%	1st	20.13 m	–	–
Wet Braking	15%	2nd	24.67 m	+0.24 m	-0.95%
Noise	15%	4th	95 dB	+15 dB	-18.75%
Rolling Resistance	35%	1st	100.20 m	–	–

So congratulations go to the Pirelli P7 Cinturato. Dominating where it mattered most, the Rolling Resistance Test, it recorded the outright longest distance of any tyre in the entire event, let alone in this category. The Italian tyre also out-braked the other tyres in its group in the dry. This, along with 2^nd best scores in the Wet Braking and Wet Grip tests were enough to see this Pirelli clinch victory in the Eco category.

RRP: S$223

---

Want to find out the results of all our other categories? Click these links for our Ultra High Performance, Comfort, SUV, and Mainstream tests!